Radiometric dating for children


17-Jun-2020 06:46

YEC John Woodmorappe (a pseudonym), for example, has been at the forefront in misquoting and misrepresenting radiometric dating results from the geology and geochemistry literature.”[xviii] “The only way creationists can hang on to their chronology is to poke all the holes they can into radiocarbon dating. Do you have any disagreements or concerns or additions?However, as we have seen, it has survived their most ardent attacks.”[xix] by Brian Mariani and others Is the above correct? Before commenting, please read the following disclosures.Radiometric dating can even work when elements move in or out of rocks.The Earth has been very stable and a lot is known about the composition of the Earth throughout its history, thus scientists are able to make very accurate descriptions and estimations of how the elements have reacted.Christopher Gregory Weber, Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon-14 Dating, Spring 1982, Vol 3, Num 2, Pages 23-29, accessed July 17, 2014.[ix] Thomas Higham, Natural Corrections: Reservoir effects, web-info radiocarbon, accessed August 7, 2014.Thus, the big, statistical picture painted by radiometric dating is excellent.

Countless radiometric studies of rocks and other objects from all over the world confirm ages of tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, and billions of years old.I am not being unscientific, but asking more questions and being skeptical is being more scientific. Brent Dalrymple, How Old is the Earth, A Response to “Scientific” Creationism: Radiometric Dating, The Talk Origins Archive, accessed August 8, 2014. Brent Dalrymple, How Old is the Earth, A Response to “Scientific” Creationism: Radiometric Dating, The Talk Origins Archive, accessed August 8, 2014. Brent Dalrymple, How Old is the Earth, A Response to “Scientific” Creationism: Radiometric Dating, The Talk Origins Archive, accessed August 8, 2014.